I study how Arab and Gulf states govern artificial intelligence — and what AI does to Arab societies, identities, and political life. My research combines the most comprehensive comparative evidence base assembled for the region with critical and interpretive scholarship on how algorithmic systems reshape discourse, ethics, and citizenship. I have lived and worked in Doha, know Qatar's governance architecture from the inside, and have built the research infrastructure to answer these questions.
Sovereign LLMs and Gulf identity. Ethical charters as performative texts. Absent voices in algorithmic futures. Data as dignity. The accountability dispersal thesis.
OUP monograph forthcoming. Plus Social Welfare in Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman (Springer), Oxford Handbooks of Evaluation & Social Welfare in the Global South, and more.
Founder of the first multi-method AI governance research programme across all 22 Arab League states. 14 datasets, fsQCA analysis, 43 interactive figures. President — Global South Evaluation Society (500+ experts, 80 countries) and MENA Evaluation Association.
Associate Professor, USI Switzerland · Visiting Professor, UC Berkeley · PI & Founder, Arab AI Governance & Society Lab · Expert in AI Governance & Society across the Arab World, Gulf States & Global South
Anis Ben Brik is Associate Professor in the Faculty of Communication, Culture and Society at the Università della Svizzera italiana (USI) and Visiting Professor at UC Berkeley. He is the Principal Investigator and Founder of the Arab AI Governance & Society Lab. His research combines large-scale comparative analysis of AI governance across 22 Arab states and 206 countries with critical and interpretive scholarship on how artificial intelligence reshapes identity, discourse, ethics, and political life in the Gulf and broader Arab world.
His central question: what does artificial intelligence do to human agency, identity, and democratic self-governance? He studies the human consequences of algorithmic governance — how AI systems reshape accountability, construct digital identities, erase marginalised voices, and challenge the foundations of self-governance across the Arab world and the Global South.
He brings particular depth to the Gulf Cooperation Council. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are not merely the most advanced AI governance actors in the Arab world — they are among the most consequential AI governance actors globally, deploying sovereign language models, national AI strategies, and regulatory architectures that challenge Western governance frameworks. His Qatar monograph (Springer, 2025), his Gulf welfare and digital governance research, and his Arab AI Governance Lab make him one of the few scholars who can speak to Gulf AI governance from both deep area knowledge and rigorous comparative method. He has lived and worked in Doha and knows the Qatar Foundation's Education City ecosystem from the inside.
As Founder and President of the Global South Evaluation Society and President of the MENA Evaluation Association, he has built international evaluation capacity through global coalitions and academic programmes, including the first master's degree in evaluation in the Global South.
How do states — particularly in the Arab world and Global South — govern artificial intelligence, and how does AI in turn govern societies? What structural conditions produce effective AI regulation? And what are the implications for human identity, ethics, creativity, and democratic accountability?
These questions connect four research streams that are not separate projects but a single cumulative intellectual programme. Across every project: does the institution do what it claims to do — or has form outpaced function? And when form outpaces function, what happens to the humans who live under that governance?
How AI reshapes Gulf and Arab identity, discourse, and citizenship — sovereign LLMs, ethics charters as performative texts, e-participation, and the erasure of conflict-affected voices from the algorithmic future.
How do Gulf and Arab states construct AI ethics? The accountability dispersal thesis. Data protection as dignity. Competing Islamic, liberal, and technocratic philosophies of human oversight.
Cross-national analysis of AI regulatory architectures across 206 countries and 22 Arab states. Governance typologies, diffusion mechanisms, measurement validity, and the gap between regulatory form and governance function.
Welfare governance, social protection, and evaluation capacity across MENA and the Global South. Leading international evaluation coalitions and building evidence infrastructure for policy that works.
Three questions connect the work: how do Arab and Gulf states govern AI? What does AI do to Arab societies and identities? And does governance actually deliver what it promises to the people who live under it?
The Arab world and Gulf states are among the most consequential sites of AI governance in the world. They have been almost entirely absent from the academic literature. This programme exists to correct that absence — with the rigour the region deserves and the critical perspective the field demands.
Across every project, I ask: does the institution do what it claims to do — or has form outpaced function? And when form outpaces function, what happens to the humans, cultures, and communities who live beneath that governance? Whether mapping Gulf AI regulatory architectures, tracing how sovereign LLMs construct Arab national identity, analysing how ethical charters perform accountability without producing it, or documenting how conflict-affected voices are erased from the algorithmic future — the underlying question is always about the distance between institutional promise and institutional reality, and the consequences of that distance for human dignity and political self-determination in the Arab world.
5 manuscripts · AI & Society · New Media & Society · Information, Communication & Society · Government Information Quarterly · Internet Policy Review
How AI systems construct, mediate, and erase cultural identities — through language models, ethical charters, sovereignty claims, and citizen-state interfaces. Applies critical discourse analysis and interpretive methods to the Arab world, examining how algorithmic power reshapes what it means to speak, to be heard, and to govern oneself in a digital age.
3 manuscripts · New Media & Society · AI & Society · AI & Ethics
What happens to human moral agency when AI systems mediate accountability and construct ethical frameworks as performative rather than substantive? Examines competing traditions of human oversight, the dignity of data subjects, and how ethical charters function as legitimacy devices rather than accountability mechanisms.
16 manuscripts · Government Information Quarterly · Regulation & Governance · J. Information Technology & Politics · Socio-Economic Review · European Union Politics · and more
Cross-national analysis of how states build, diffuse, and fail to build AI governance architectures — across 206 countries, 2017–2024. This programme provides the empirical foundation for the critical inquiry: you cannot understand what AI governance fails to deliver for human dignity without first mapping what it actually produces institutionally.
+ 8 further manuscripts across Technology in Society, Quality & Quantity, Science and Public Policy, Review of Policy Research, and others.
19 manuscripts · books · welfare systems · crisis governance · evaluation
Deep area expertise in the Arab world and Global South — welfare governance, crisis policy, evaluation capacity, democratic backsliding, and social protection. The 22 Arab states are not simply data points but distinct political economies, governance traditions, and social contracts. The accountability dispersal thesis connects this programme to the critical and interpretive core.
Books and journal articles spanning AI governance, AI & Society, comparative public policy, and welfare systems — across four research programmes.
Leading transformative initiatives across international organisations, evaluation networks, and policy institutions — from the UN to the European Commission, from MENA to the Global South.
100+ international presentations across 50+ countries — from UN headquarters in New York to Oxford, Singapore, Delhi, Rabat, and Brussels.
Courses designed for communication students engaging critically with AI, media, governance, and the Arab world — bridging critical and interpretive perspectives with rigorous empirical method.
Historical and political analysis of the Middle East from the Ottoman era to the present — state formation, colonialism, independence movements, authoritarianism, and the contemporary politics of the Arab world.
Comparative political analysis of governance, authoritarianism, reform, and state-society relations across the Arab world and broader Middle East region.
Political economy, governance, social transformation, and foreign policy of the Gulf Cooperation Council states — rentier systems, labour migration, digital governance, and Vision-era reforms.
How communication systems shape and are shaped by social structures, institutions, and power. Media sociology, digital communication, and the sociology of information in comparative perspective.
Systematic comparison of political systems, institutions, and behaviour across states — democratic theory, authoritarianism, regime transitions, and political economy in global context.
Cross-national policy comparison with focus on MENA, developed vs. developing states, and comparative institutional analysis.
Statistical reasoning, research design, and quantitative analysis for social and policy science. Survey methods, experimental design, regression analysis, and data interpretation.
Interpretive and critical approaches to social inquiry. Ethnography, case study, discourse analysis, comparative case studies, and mixed-method designs in communication and policy research.
Advanced statistical modelling for social scientists. Multivariate methods, panel data, structural equation modelling, fsQCA, and quantitative text analysis applied to governance and communication research.
Integrative doctoral-level course spanning research design, causal inference, advanced quantitative and qualitative methods, and mixed-methods approaches. Emphasis on publishable research and methodological pluralism.
RCTs, quasi-experimental methods, and SPSS labs for professional evaluators.
Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in Qatar.
Executive education course in evidence-based program and policy evaluation.
Open to research collaborations, speaking engagements, and academic partnerships in AI governance, communication, and AI governance research.